|
Post by person1 on Oct 10, 2006 12:34:49 GMT -5
I am not voting for this man. The purpose of sex is to make babies and not to have fun, and the purpose of marriage is to raise those babies and establish legal lines of inheritance. Spitzer is very wrong on this issue.
|
|
|
Post by 666 on Oct 10, 2006 12:57:57 GMT -5
Thats a nice way of saying that you are against gays. Thanks for informing everyone about the purpose of sex. One of the main purposes of sex is pleasure. Consider what one wise man named Solomon wrote. He said:
Drink water from your own cistern And fresh water from your own well. Should your springs be dispersed abroad, Streams of water in the streets? Let them be yours alone And not for strangers with you. Let your fountain be blessed, And rejoice in the wife of your youth. As a loving hind and a graceful doe, Let her breasts satisfy you at all times; Be exhilarated always with her love ~(Proverbs 5:15-19 NASB).
Solomon's ancient love sonnet, the "Song of Solomon," is one of the best sex manuals ever written and traces the beauty of a sexual relationship in marriage. It gets pretty hot and juicy, so be careful where you are when you read it. (Would it surprise you to know that it's in the Bible?)
Another purpose of sex is to develop oneness or unity. "For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh"(Genesis 2:24 NASB).
A third purpose for sex is procreation. That, of course, is how we all got here.
Why don't you just say you're against gays or find another way to cover the fact that you're an anti-gay bigot. Come on try to be honest. You are very very wrong with your excuse.
|
|
|
Post by person1 on Oct 11, 2006 13:31:48 GMT -5
You can have your opinion. I have mine. Sex was made to feel good otherwise we wouldn't have it. Your last reason is the only true reason. Anything else is a spin to justify lust. Solomon's perversions are well known.
|
|
|
Post by 666 on Oct 11, 2006 14:00:18 GMT -5
You should read your own posts before you respond. Your first post states "The purpose of sex is to make babies and not to have fun" Your next post states "Sex was made to feel good otherwise we wouldn't have it." Having trouble making up your mind? You are right you can have your own opinion, however wrong it is. You're still a gay bashing bigot.....thats not an opinion its a fact based on your own post. You just don't have the guts to admit it. I hope that for everyone elses sake you don't have any kids. I'd hate to see you pass your twisted thinking on to anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by USER7777 on Oct 11, 2006 14:20:20 GMT -5
I am voting for Spitzer.
But I don't believe in Gay marriage, but if they want to have some type of union,so be it. I am not going to stand in their way. Spitzer will make positive changes in our State, that has for so long 'trying' to survive.
|
|
|
Post by person1 on Oct 11, 2006 14:51:22 GMT -5
to 666
It makes perfect sense to me. It doesnt matter to me if you accept homosexuality as normal. Its not. Why cant a man/man or woman/woman sex produce a baby? It goes against nature for a reason. Homosexuality is a form of lust. Lust causes grief and problems between our brother. That is one of the deadly vices. Call me a gay basher because that is the politicly correct way to call the one who stands up for what is right. If I am against the gay lifestyle you say I have a bigot opinion. I say if you accept it you have a unnatural pervertion.
I wont vote for Spitzer because of that view.
|
|
|
Post by USER7777 on Oct 11, 2006 15:11:46 GMT -5
I don't promote it at all. I for years HAVE had many gays who I helped, some got out of the lifestyle, some died.
But I don't bash them,I pray for them. I keep myself open to help them, most I know were victims of molestation. Their sin is no different than any other sin, God doesn't have degrees of Sin, that is something RELIGION has made up. True Christianity embraces the sinner but not his SIN. That's what Jesus did.
|
|
|
Post by thecleaninglady on Oct 11, 2006 16:55:06 GMT -5
person1: You state the purpose of sex is to make babies. What about those couples who cannot have babies? Should they get divorced? Should the one who has "the problem" never have sex again because they cannot reproduce?
You have the view that people are only together to have sex/babies. You mentioned nothing about love. If that were the case then my husband would have divorced me years ago when I was having "female issues" and could not have sex. But, out of love, he stood by me through everything. That is what a relationship should be built on. LOVE.
Just because a person is gay does not mean that they don't truly love their partner. There are people you see on the street every day that are gay and you don't even know it.
Don't vote for Spitzer...that is your choice. I really don't think he is gonna suffer if you don't.
|
|
|
Post by 666 on Oct 12, 2006 6:19:26 GMT -5
person1, your opinion is full of hate and prejudice towards a whole GROUP of people. You write of lust being the cause of grief and problems between our brother. How about the problems that prejudice thinking causes. You are a bigot who is hiding behind medieval thinking. Now you write that people who accept the gay life style are perverted. That remark shows how truely ignorant you are. Who decides what is normal and what is not, you?
user7777, bringing your religous opinion into this as if we all are Christian shows your ignorance. Beyond what you believe the whole world is not Christian and does not buy into the bible and its constantly changing teachings. You helped people get out of the gay lifestyle? You're a fool, who gave you this wonderful power to change the way people feel and think. You must be the blessed one. The others died you write, so no one told you to stick it and are living a happy life. Hard, very hard to believe.....in short you're full of it and need check yourself. Please don't reply and tell me how many people you have saved from the eternal flames of hell, I heard and delt with too many of your type. Take a reality break and save the RELIGION for church where we all don't have to listen to it.
|
|
|
Post by USER7777 on Oct 12, 2006 11:33:18 GMT -5
666, Your name,666, is a well known name for the antichrist. Since you are anti Christianity, why do you use a symbol that is talked about in true Christian Churches, not Churches like the Roman Catholic one? I gave Gays the connections to help themselves. I don't have power like you think you do. You sound like you need to go back to IO, your hatered for others will blend with the others over there who have a lot of hatered and jealous behavior also.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 12, 2006 11:48:00 GMT -5
I think we can each have opinions here. The speak/tone of the one user does not necessarily mean it is an IO user, does it? Actually, I like to read a good debate. Its when things like "you moron, idiot, imbecile, creep, braindead wingnut, etc..." come up that things start to lose effectiveness. Lets try to show some respect. Its OK to disagree. Really. It breaks up the monotony of online life.
|
|
6666 is that better
Guest
|
Post by 6666 is that better on Oct 12, 2006 12:33:56 GMT -5
I have never said I was or am anti-christian. 666 is a number and just a number. Your problem is that you think because I questioned your remarks about gays that I am full of hate. Look in the mirror if you want to see hate. You don't like that fact that your idea of using religion to justify hate was questioned or that you were called on your statement of "changing gays". You claim to be a Christian yet you are quick to pass judgement on the gay community as being sinners. Just what the hell is your opinion of a True Christian anyway? What am I jealous about, I'd really like to know that one? Is everyone who disagrees with YOUR Christian views full of hate an :Pd jealousy? As for going anywhere such as back to IO, if the admin wants to remove my posts then he will and I'll live with his decisions. FYI I do believe in a higher power, I just like keeping my religion private and out of public discussions. I would also never be so arrogant as to think that what I believe is the only belief that counts. I can't believe I wrote that whole thing and never even called you a ..........? I must be getting soft.
|
|
|
Post by USER7777 on Oct 12, 2006 14:12:03 GMT -5
UNTIL HATEFUL AND LYING PEOPLE LIKE YOU, BETH( FIRSTCASS,ETC) ,POWER 2 (WHICH COULD BE YOU), RECTIFER, AND BERR >:(LEAVE THIS SITE, I WONT' POST HERE ANYMORE. I NOW KNOW NOW LITTLET MUST FEEL. LETTING THE TROUBLE MAKERS ON HERE, ONLY BREEDS MORE HATE, AND I REFUSE TO BE PART F IT.
|
|
|
Post by 6666 on Oct 12, 2006 14:51:15 GMT -5
And what lies would you be speaking of? I don't remember posting anything that was a lie. I questioned your posts, thats not lying. You want to be able to make remarks and not get any negative feed back. This is not your home where you might be king and everything you say is gospel. This is a web site like many others where people voice opinions and question others on their opinions. You were real quick to voice your opinion until I questioned it and then became annoyed. If your belief is so strong and you feel its right then my questions should of been easy to reply to. People only run away when they are unsure in their own minds and feel threatened. There is no reason to act like a child and have a tantrum. All you had do do was say you were not interested in debating your beliefs. I'm pretty easy and would of left it alone. The solution is an easy one, stay out of posts if you don't want to have others disagree with you. Sorry if I hurt your feelings. Now grow up.
|
|
|
Post by USER7777 on Oct 12, 2006 15:56:48 GMT -5
I became annoyed because I am sick of ignorant people like you who don't debate but try to control every web site they come on.
I don' have to debate my faith,I live what I believe.
I am not running away from here, I will continue to watch you and a few others destroy this web site just like you 'all' said you would. I won't be part of our scheme.
|
|
|
Post by thecleaninglady on Oct 12, 2006 20:22:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by little2ued on Oct 17, 2006 6:55:56 GMT -5
As A gay woman with a girl friend, I can assure you that our love is very real. Our relationship is not based on sex. It is a very deep personal affection we share for each other. An understanding and mutual respect that we have never found with anyone else.. She is the only person in this world for me. I thank God everyday for sending her to me! Think of me as you will.... little t
|
|
|
Post by thecleaninglady on Oct 17, 2006 7:25:02 GMT -5
"I can assure you that our love is very real." "An understanding and mutual respect that we have never found with anyone else." Those two statements are the best "argument" yet.
Love, understanding and respect are the most important part of any personal relationship. The sex part is an added bonus... ;D
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 17, 2006 15:35:13 GMT -5
Love, understanding and respect are the most important part of any personal relationship. The sex part is an added bonus... ;D I can't argue with that one.
|
|