|
Post by Nobama on Jun 3, 2008 10:54:46 GMT -5
Yes, I wanted Clinton for the democratic nomination. No way am I voting for Obama or McCain for President. It would be a vote of no confidence. That leaves Ron Paul. I thought about it, and this guy has guts. A little strict in his views, but he has what it takes to get the job done.
|
|
|
Post by baddog on Jun 3, 2008 12:18:17 GMT -5
If you vote for Ron Paul, you might as well vote for Elvis. Ron Paul has many good ideas, but because of his strange behavior he doesn't stand a snow balls chance in hell of winning. Voting for him in hopes of making some kind of statement is a waste of a vote. When its all done and over he will still be an 'also ran', and nobody will remember him. The race is between Obama and McCain and I have a hard time believing Obama is capable of running this country. He is exactly what Bush called him, an appeaser who will tell anyone whatever they want to hear. Obama has done a great job making promises he can't keep. Many people will vote for him in the belief he is going to make some huge difference in our lives when in reality he will divide this country even more. I'll vote for McCain.
|
|
|
Post by ProClinton on Jun 4, 2008 8:21:26 GMT -5
I hope that Hillary doesnt throw in the towel because i believe she was done wrong when it comes down to it. If the super delegates have the final say over who is going to win then why should the American people even bother to vote. If i could talk to Hillary in person i would tell her to keep up the fight and take it all the way even as far as going to the Supreme Court. I really believe she lost this because she is a woman and also because of who her husband is, which i think is a crying shame because i believe she will be the best for the job,after all what do we really know about Obama besides he knows how to talk a good talk and walk a good walk. America i think its time we stand up for what we believe in don't you . God bless you and your family Hillary.
|
|
|
Post by oneguy on Jun 4, 2008 12:16:48 GMT -5
Hillary would of stood a better chance of winning if she was black. Being a white woman allowed for the media to attack her on her physical appearance, on her "bitchy" attitude, and any other woman hating stereotype they could think of. The media was careful whenever the Obama name was mentioned, it was scared to say anything that might resemble a raciest remark. Yet because woman have been treated like second rate citizens in the US for a couple hundred years it was easy to say and write outrageous remarks without worrying that there would be repercussions. Hillary was referred to as being too much of a woman when she cried and too much of a bitch when she stood up for herself for what she believed. She was attacked for her looks over and over by mainstream media. If she looked tired she was a hag, if her dress was too feminine she was a slut. Obama could of dressed like a two bit NY pimp and the media wouldn't dare say anything out of fear of being called racist.
Unfortunately the politically correct media, along with a large portion of the male population still believes bashing woman is ok. Just one guys opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Very Valid Point on Jun 4, 2008 18:31:03 GMT -5
You know what, oneguy, everything that you said is sooo true. Everything we see, hear and read is controlled by the media. Remember when Jimmy Carter was pushed into the forefront by the media. Who the hell is this peanut farmer?
So too with Obama. He's nothing more than a glib, smoothtalking, superliberal with a chip on his shoulder, backed by REV Al Sharpton and His Most Excellence, REV Jesse Jackson and a host of other biased organizations who only vote color, not qualifications or experience.
I don't know who I will eventually vote for for president. One thing I can tell you is who I WON'T vote for. That would be the super liberal, B. Hussein Obama.
|
|
|
Post by Scriba Hotshot on Jun 4, 2008 21:14:10 GMT -5
|
|
Mr.Steve
New Member
General Lurker
Posts: 16
|
Post by Mr.Steve on Jun 5, 2008 7:41:32 GMT -5
Thats funny. Coulter says Hillary is more of a man than Gore and she would know. And this one is LOL!
|
|
|
Post by lenny on Jun 5, 2008 7:52:01 GMT -5
Hey Steve anyone ever tell you you're an idiot? If not let me be the first.....you're an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by anonymous on Jun 5, 2008 9:21:31 GMT -5
Hey Steve anyone ever tell you you're an idiot? If not let me be the first.....you're an idiot. Another top notch well thought out post. Fits over on Inside Oswego, not here. Why do you have to bring this website down lenny and whatever other name you are?
|
|
|
Post by Laker on Jun 5, 2008 10:08:31 GMT -5
Mr Steve (New name for the new week)
I have come to the conclusion that you truly are a full blown idiot of the first magnitude. [Plus being a pain in the rump.]
No one likes a person who tries to be cute
|
|
|
Post by Fr Lucifer on Jun 5, 2008 11:21:19 GMT -5
A couple of you have issues. And that is not directed at this Steve person.
|
|
|
Post by lou c fer on Jun 5, 2008 12:35:44 GMT -5
I've got issues, lots of em. Anyone care? Didn't think so. Thanks anyway.
|
|
|
Post by oneguy on Jun 5, 2008 13:36:51 GMT -5
Steve thanks for helping me make my point about woman being judged unfairly. You must be Gods gift to the human race or a real big jackass. More than likely a jackass.
|
|
|
Post by I never knew on Jun 5, 2008 14:21:24 GMT -5
So Ann Coulter is a transvestite?
|
|
|
Post by Scriba Hot Shot on Jun 5, 2008 17:02:06 GMT -5
Ann Coulter is a transvestite?
I hardly think so. If she was, so was Marilyn Monroe and Mother Theresa. But while we are on the subject, I heard on very good authority that B. Hussein Obanana is a cross dresser.
What did you hear? I don't want to hear gossip, just the straight scoop.
|
|
|
Post by Outsider on Aug 22, 2008 13:18:30 GMT -5
Ann Coulter is Skeletor.
|
|
|
Post by Look on Aug 26, 2008 7:32:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by getreal on Aug 26, 2008 9:50:53 GMT -5
Ron Paul is a nut case. Ron Paul, in some corners of the web community, is the second coming of Gandhi. Most of this praise is for his stance on Iraq. He says he hates it, and thinks we should get out. When placed on stage and surrounded by Republicans, he stands out as someone who maybe has a brain in their head. However underneath all of that glitter, he’s an oil guy…just like Bush. He wants to drill in ANWR. He doesn’t want to increase gas mileage standards. He wants to allow new offshore drilling. He wants to protect oil companies from contamination lawsuits. He wants to stop having oil companies pay royalties for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. Ron Paul also thinks Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided. He even went so far to sponsor legislation that states that “human life shall be deemed to exist from conception.”
He wrote an article called “Christmas in Secular America” that sounds like it’s straight out of Bill O’Reilly’s lunatic ‘War on Christmas’ playbook.
“The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.”
Uhhmm.. no they didn’t Ron. They most specifically DID NOT envision churches as eclipsing the state in importance. In fact, Jefferson despised organized religion. Re rallied against the very type of people that Ron Paul wants running the country. Most of the founding fathers were anti-religious men not religious fanatics like Ron Paul.
|
|
|
Post by not true on Aug 27, 2008 7:27:54 GMT -5
Ron Paul is a nut case. Ron Paul, in some corners of the web community, is the second coming of Gandhi. Most of this praise is for his stance on Iraq. He says he hates it, and thinks we should get out. When placed on stage and surrounded by Republicans, he stands out as someone who maybe has a brain in their head. However underneath all of that glitter, he’s an oil guy…just like Bush. He wants to drill in ANWR. He doesn’t want to increase gas mileage standards. He wants to allow new offshore drilling. He wants to protect oil companies from contamination lawsuits. He wants to stop having oil companies pay royalties for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. Ron Paul also thinks Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided. He even went so far to sponsor legislation that states that “human life shall be deemed to exist from conception.” He wrote an article called “Christmas in Secular America” that sounds like it’s straight out of Bill O’Reilly’s lunatic ‘War on Christmas’ playbook. “The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance.” Uhhmm.. no they didn’t Ron. They most specifically DID NOT envision churches as eclipsing the state in importance. In fact, Jefferson despised organized religion. Re rallied against the very type of people that Ron Paul wants running the country. Most of the founding fathers were anti-religious men not religious fanatics like Ron Paul. So your atheist views are making lies about Ron Paul. Without Christianity you have no ethics, no morals. Ron Paul is a good and decent man. He wants whats is best for us all.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Bezal on Aug 27, 2008 8:05:30 GMT -5
Sorry but the facts are that he says one thing and then votes just the opposite. How do you spell loser.......RON PAUL!
And your belief in a mythical god has nothing to do with ethics. Christianity is a bunch of BS. You believe in a book written by some fools about an idiot who claimed to be the son of god, yet they all thought the world was flat....lol get a clue. Be sure to ask for a double shot of cool aid.
|
|
|
Post by Batman on Aug 27, 2008 10:46:53 GMT -5
Every Christian fanatic uses the same line about morals because its all they have. How many good Christians kill, rob, do illegal drugs, and commit every other crime known to man? Being a Christian doesn't mean you have any more morals or ethics than the Atheist, Jew or the Muslim who lives next door. Christians have committed some of the most horrific crimes in the history of mankind while hiding behind the mask of Christ. Madmen, political leaders and Christian militants have all justified their own violent actions under the belief that if they think God wants it, then they can therefore do it regardless of the cost to society. The Dark Ages, Europe's darkest centuries, were ravaged in ignorance and blood under this type of rule.
If you tell a child there is a Santa Claus that is a lie and you have just committed a sin according to your Christian morals.
|
|
|
Post by I am the Truth on Aug 27, 2008 12:09:54 GMT -5
Bad people take a good thing and use it for their personal advantage. That is not the Christian way. Those are the losers. They are the true atheists. Jesus would never kill, steal, do illegal drugs, etc. Your example shows how man is not perfect and makes mistakes.
Our country was founded using Christian ideals. Atheists have no way to devise morals or ethics without the goodness Jesus taught us. Atheists do nothing but attack Christians because they are scared of Christians being right about salvation.
So play your game. I'd rather be wrong about Jesus and live a good life, than be in your position and find out I was wrong. If you didn't know, that's called Pascal's Wager. Look it up.
|
|
|
Post by Batman on Aug 27, 2008 13:53:33 GMT -5
Its mindless Christians who are scared of an imaginary God. No different than primitive man being scared of the sun, thunder, and natures disasters. You pray to a non-existent being for forgiveness after you commit crimes against your neighbors as if if makes a difference. You're a nut case if you believe that by looking at the stars and asking for forgiveness makes your wrong doings any less wrong. Simply put you're a coward, you're scared to face the reality that you are going to die and your body will rot like any other piece of meat left to the elements. There is not going to be a day of reckoning and you won't be sitting at the feet of the King of Kings. Sorry ain't gonna happen. You yourself go against the teachings of your bible by attacking non-Christians. However from the way you reply I can tell you're one of the so-called Christians who believes you can attack others in the name of Christ and its all OK Religion does not make you any better or worse than anyone else. You obviously use your religion to make yourself feel better than the "other guy". Sorry, doesn't work that way.
|
|
|
Post by Satan on Aug 27, 2008 13:54:28 GMT -5
I'd rather treat people in a humane based on the belief that we all need to get along in order to live in a peace, than to be scared some god is going to cast my soul into eternal fire. Freak!
|
|
|
Post by I am the Truth on Aug 28, 2008 7:42:00 GMT -5
Believe what you wish. That is why we have free will. But like I said, I would rather live my life like there is God, because I have nothing to loose. Tell me what do I loose? Am I a bad person for believing in God? If so, how does it make me bad? I'm not afraid of the name calling. Words are just that.
But let me ask, if you live your life as if there is no God, and one does exist, where will that leave you? The way I see it, from the view of an Atheist, I would have everything to loose when I realize that their is eternal life.
|
|
|
Post by Batman on Aug 28, 2008 8:27:12 GMT -5
You can believe in anything your heart desires, but to say that atheists and other Non-Christians have no morals or are unethical is wrong and disrespectful. That statement is one of the reasons why Christians are hated all over the world. Its called religious arrogance.
Religion is what man uses to explain what he can't comprehend, and to hide from reality.
|
|
|
Post by Outsider on Aug 28, 2008 9:48:57 GMT -5
Some wonderful regimes that despised organized religion include:
'Dolph, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Tito, Franco and the list could go on. Hundreds of millions of people have died at the hands of Dictators that despised organized religion and attempted to purge their countries of people that believe in a Higher Being.
|
|
|
Post by SATAN on Aug 28, 2008 12:24:21 GMT -5
A small list of religious wars....a very small list. Nazi's crusade against the Jews and Gypsies The Crusades in the middle ages Israeli/Palestinian wars Spanish Inquisition An Shi Rebellion Mongol Conquests Shaka's conquest Napoleonic Wars 1971 Bangladesh atrocities Ustashe massacres of Serbs, Jews, Roma Nanking Massacre Al-Anfal Campaign
Thats a small portion of the list that grows daily. I was going to add up all the deaths in the last century that have been caused by religious wars but its an astronomical number and I don't have the time.
Would you like to discuss the number of deaths directly related to religious cults in the last 25 years? Cults like Heavens Gate, Order of the Solar Temple, Waco or Jonestown. How about deaths related to religious atrocities that are not considered wars? Such as genocide of the Aztecs, Roman Persecution of Christians, Salem Witch Hunts, Episcopal Inquisition, Papal Inquisition, Mountain Meadows massacre, Thuggee Murders, again a list that is too large to spend all day on.
How about religious serial killers? The FBI gave the standard profile of a serial killer as a person with few friends who became more religious just before he started murdering people. Serial killers were sexually inhibited by their strong religious upbringing.
Nearly all serial killers are very devout men who were raised by members of Pentecostal sects, fundamentalist Catholics or were 'hard-shell' Baptists and Methodists."
Studies after study show serial killers are a product of this environment, not genetics.
RELIGION IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL.
|
|
|
Post by Outsider on Sept 2, 2008 10:27:53 GMT -5
The NAZIS were not a religious group and did not use religion as a means of persecuting the Jews and other groups they deemed as unacceptable in German society.
Unfortunately extremists like you SATAN and religious extremists cause more trouble in this world than the silent majority.
|
|
|
Post by SATAN on Sept 3, 2008 7:27:37 GMT -5
The Nazi war against the Jews is considered a religious war by historians. You're calling me an extremist only shows your ignorance. My views are far from being extreme in any way. I don't buy into your fantasy so you start with the labels in an attempt to cover up the truth that you have NO facts to back up your "faith". Just as you wrote the stupid line of " Hundreds of millions of people have died at the hands of Dictators that despised organized religion". Hundreds of millions? Where did you pull that number out of? You call everyone who has different views an extremist, you need to learn what words mean before you use them or don't use then at all. The more you write the less intelligent you come off as being. Debating anything with you is a waste because your pea brain doesn't have the capability to reply with anything of substance.
|
|